Hi Lesley
Thanks for the information - it sounds most interesting and definitely worth looking into. I suppose that if the parish "legitimised" their relationship in 1800, it would have lessened the pressure on them to get married straight away, but I can't imagine the second child went down very well!
Best wishes
Richard
Adamson/Black of Fife
Moderator: Global Moderators
-
LesleyB
- Posts: 8184
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Scotland
hi Richard
It was quite possible to be legally married, but not married in the eyes of the church... usually if there was any doubt (e.g. if they had come from a different parish) proof of their marriage would be asked for, so I'm a bit puzzled by the situation you describe...
Best wishes
Lesley
The parish, in most cases, would require them to be married pretty much on the spot if they could not provide proof of a relevant marriage, before a child would be accepted for christening.I suppose that if the parish "legitimised" their relationship in 1800, it would have lessened the pressure on them to get married straight away, but I can't imagine the second child went down very well!
It was quite possible to be legally married, but not married in the eyes of the church... usually if there was any doubt (e.g. if they had come from a different parish) proof of their marriage would be asked for, so I'm a bit puzzled by the situation you describe...
Best wishes
Lesley
-
LesleyB
- Posts: 8184
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Scotland
-
DavidWW
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm
The subtlety here is that they could well have been perfectly validly married in the eyes of Scots Law, but not so in terms of the Established Church of Scotland, or, equally so, other Scottish presbyterian churches, - see http://talkingscot.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3726 quoted above in Lesley's reply.RChristopher wrote:Hi Lesley
Thanks for the information - it sounds most interesting and definitely worth looking into. I suppose that if the parish "legitimised" their relationship in 1800, it would have lessened the pressure on them to get married straight away, but I can't imagine the second child went down very well!
Best wishes
Richard
Just to add to the possible complications of the situation, it could well have been the case that they were perfectly legally married in the eyes of, say, the original Secession Church, or one of the the many other breakway presbyterian churches, - see http://talkingscot.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7931 for a simplified description of the situation
David
-
LesleyB
- Posts: 8184
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Scotland
Hi Richard
Your Adamsons are really puzzling me even more now....
Children from SP (LDs site is down for maintenance
) :
Without a look at the actual OPR records, I doubt I'm going to get this mystery untangled, and my remaining credits just aint gonna run to all that lot!!
Best wishes
Lesley
Your Adamsons are really puzzling me even more now....
Children from SP (LDs site is down for maintenance
- Parents: David Adamson & Williamina/ Wilmina /Wilhelmina Black
Agnes Adamson Kilconquhar 08/02/1800
Miney Adamson Kilconquhar 01/01/1802
George Adamson Leith North 15/08/1811
James Adamson Leith North 01/06/1813
David Adamson Leith North 15/06/1815
William Adamson Elie 13/07/1817
John Fernie Adamson Elie 17/07/1819
Robert Adamson Elie16/06/1821
Without a look at the actual OPR records, I doubt I'm going to get this mystery untangled, and my remaining credits just aint gonna run to all that lot!!
Best wishes
Lesley
-
LesleyB
- Posts: 8184
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Scotland
-
AndrewP
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6189
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: Edinburgh
Hi Richard & Lesley,
She is there on SP.
18/12/1807 ADAMSON JANET DAVID ADAMSON/WILLIAM F Kilconquhar /FIFE 436/ 0030 0309
The IGI has it right, the mother is written as William Mina Black.
However SP has it wrong in the index, the mother is down as William (no surname) so if you include Black as part of the search criteria you will not find her.
All the best,
Andrew
She is there on SP.
18/12/1807 ADAMSON JANET DAVID ADAMSON/WILLIAM F Kilconquhar /FIFE 436/ 0030 0309
The IGI has it right, the mother is written as William Mina Black.
However SP has it wrong in the index, the mother is down as William (no surname) so if you include Black as part of the search criteria you will not find her.
All the best,
Andrew
-
LesleyB
- Posts: 8184
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Scotland