Scot*land*sPeop*le.....

Looking for Scottish Ancestors

Moderator: Global Moderators

Davie
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: Glasgow

Scot*land*sPeop*le.....

Post by Davie » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:53 am

Greetin’s all,
Frae a rather wet Glasgow the day.
As a new member here I have enjoyed reading through the posts.
It is nice to so many helpful folk.
I am not posting here tae teach ma grannie tae suck eggs, as I am sure most of you know your way round Scotlandspeople.
However for some who don’t, here is ma tuppenies worth.
When in doubt use the wee asterisk *
My family name is McNaughtan, which has several variations.
So if you have a Mc or Mac in yer name this is the idea.
M*C*NAU*
That covers Mc, Mac and Mack plus all the other endings.
M*c*Farl*, M*C*Mil* etc.are the same.
A lot of the old spellings used Mack rather than, Mc or Mac.
As you all know mac means son of, while Nic means daughter of.
As for other tricky names like my Paterson.
It is Pa*ters*
That gets Paterson or Patterson, but not Pattison
Likewise, Mill*r, Miller Millar.
This goes for given names as well.
Is* covers Isabel Isa etc, but not Bella.
An* gives you Ann, Annette etc. but make sure it is a female you are searching for.
JAN* Jane Janet
Eli* Eliza Elizabeth, but not Beth or Betty
I have a few lassies in my line that have been christened Elizabeth but used Isabella.
Awrabest
Glesga Davie

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Mon Aug 15, 2005 5:41 pm

Hi Glesga Davie

For some reason, and I haven't ever, yet, bottomed it out, the great majority of researchers don't use wildcards, * or % for any number of characters, including none; and ? or _ for a single character but not no character. Practice varies on different databases, so check!!

SP uses * % and ? ........ but the PRO (TNA) 1901 census database uses _ instead of ? ...

Part of the problem is the mistaken belief that "we have always spelt our surname that way" together with a lack of understanding that Ann on the birth register entry might later be known as Anne, Annie, Annette, Anita .... or Edith as Bunty !!

For the moment, please, let's get into variants for Jane or Elizabeth......... !! (Blows are known to have been exchanged as to what are "acceptable" variants !! <g>)

User statistics from ScotlandsPeople indicate that only an incredibly small number of searches on SP use either Soundex option or wildcards.

As Glesga Davie's post very neatly illustrates there are lots and lots of potential variants out there based not only on "natural" variants, i.e those which are generally accepted for both surnames and given names, but also the myriad of further variants which are based on the mis-hearing of the recorder, be that the registrar or the minister (marriage schedules for the purpose of statutory recording) or the census enumerator, for statutory records or censuses, or the misinterpretation of indexers at various stages, never mind earlier even "wilder" variants in the OPRs, sometimes depending on the degree of sobriety of the minister or the session clerk, or the fact that rough notes were sometime written up in the OPR many months later ........

"M*c" names are amongst the worst in terms of variants, and I can only encourage folk to read the introduction to Black's "The Surnames of Scotland" in order just to begin to understand the possible spelling variations for such surnames (and that's without even getting into the subject of aliases ....)

I've too often come across a most unusual variant, whatever the reason, that finally shows that there was a record, to put any faith in the Flying Saucer Theory !!

As a nice wee illustration of just what can happen, once upon a time there was a wee lasse who grew up into a bigger lassie who was known as "Essie", - so what do you think was the name on her birth register entry? (those of you who know the answer are disbarred from answering !!)

David

Davie
Posts: 607
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by Davie » Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:50 pm

Here is an interesting wee site for yer perusal.
http://www.thinkbabynames.com/
As Dictionary Davie (until I find a better way of distinguishing ooresels) states.
“We have always spelt our surname that way"
Or as I have come across
“We have the Irish spelling”
Is a guid point and I have had a look at David's stuff, and he knows the score.
However, and that is better than but,
The amount of people who accept as “Gospel” when they see a death certificate of a death on “Scotlandspeople”
What you have to realise is, it is only the “informant “who is passing on the information.
Which is probably ok if it is a son or daughter, and even then I am never convinced, without confirmation.
As a wee test.
Ask any o’ yer ain weans, if they know ther Mither’s maiden name never mind ther’ Grannies.
Awrabest
Glesga Davie

nelmit
Posts: 4002
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by nelmit » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:07 pm

Davie wrote: As a wee test.
Ask any o’ yer ain weans, if they know ther Mither’s maiden name never mind ther’ Grannies.
Awrabest
Glesga Davie
I did and they do. But in my case they could also probably tell you their g. gran's too :shock: .

Anyway 'listening' to you two having a wee friendly blether made me think that everyone (who perhaps don't quite understand our Scottish colloquialisms) would enjoy tuning in to the new BBC series on Scottish words.

www.bbc.co.uk/voices

Annette M

Rosey
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:35 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by Rosey » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:26 pm

Hi DavidWW

Could Essie be Esther?

Rosey
Researching -
ALEXANDER and BROWN - Glasgow area (originally from Ireland)
AITKEN (AITKIN, ATKINS) - Dalkeith
CHRISTIE and MARTIN - Forfar
MEEK - Kircardine/Aberdeen/Forfar
BEATTIE - Kircardine

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:16 am

Rosey wrote:Hi DavidWW

Could Essie be Esther?

Rosey
Nope!, - nice try, but !!

David
Last edited by DavidWW on Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:20 am

Davie wrote:....snipped..... As Dictionary Davie (until I find a better way of distinguishing ooresels)...snipped.......
I was only ever an accidental "Davie", - have a look at the standard QWERTY keyboard to understand the reason, but it stuck and I stuck with it.

As of now, however, I'm reverting to my name in every day life - "David" !!

David

If needed for telling apart, then "DavidWW"

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:28 am

Davie wrote:Here is an interesting wee site for yer perusal.
http://www.thinkbabynames.com/
As Dictionary Davie (until I find a better way of distinguishing ooresels) states.
“We have always spelt our surname that way"
Or as I have come across
“We have the Irish spelling”
Is a guid point and I have had a look at David's stuff, and he knows the score.
However, and that is better than but,
The amount of people who accept as “Gospel” when they see a death certificate of a death on “Scotlandspeople”
What you have to realise is, it is only the “informant “who is passing on the information.
Which is probably ok if it is a son or daughter, and even then I am never convinced, without confirmation.
As a wee test.
Ask any o’ yer ain weans, if they know ther Mither’s maiden name never mind ther’ Grannies.
Awrabest
Glesga Davie
Here's a right one for you ............. 7 siblings born over ca. 12 years in the same parish; all registered by the mother (but she did sign with a cross); and all handled by the same registrar, whom you'd think, given the size of the small town involved, could have been expected to have some memory of the family... so why why was the one kid in the middle of the seven (the subject of the search, of course!) registered as MICKLEVENNA when all the others were shown with the exact same "correct" spelling of McILVENNY, - I can easily explain it in terms of an Ulster accent (both parents born there) and the resultant pronunciation of McILVENNY, but not the scenario described, unless, ... unless, ...... and this has just struck me, was hubby also along for this one registration?, but let his wife sign the entry, and it was his accent that confused the registrar.

Other possible explanations gratefully received!

David

sheilajim
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: san clemente california

Post by sheilajim » Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:57 pm

Could Essie be Elizabeth?

Sheila
Sheila

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:05 pm

sheilajim wrote:Could Essie be Elizabeth?

Sheila
Sheila

Getting closer, but not yet there !!

David