Jack wrote:Glad to hear that Davie,
It does make a huge diiference, but i'd still like to know why there has to be a time limit at all - we pay upfront, they've got our cash.
But we've been down this road before, and never did find out why one was imposed in the first place - nor who was responsible for it.
Jack

Hi Jack
Valid question !!
Not sure if I can supply the definitive answer, but I'll do my best!
If you visit NRH in Edinburgh and pay the £17 access fee that gives access to all the resources available at NRH for the day, so that you then accept the limits of that access.
Such access is very clearly defined in terms of the relevant Scottish legislation, and in particular the associated "Statutory Instruments", - which, incidentally but most importantly, permit, - let's not forget, - a much greater degree of access to the Scottish records, compared to the access permitted by the equivalent legislation and associated regulations in England and Wales.............
Previously, on the basis of fiche access, I held the record for accessing fiche BMD records at NRH, - 185 in a day, - but I cheated!! <g> in that I pre-prepared the fiche order slips !! - the cost being £17, - but what would such an exercise have cost in England ??!
When the GROS records first went on-line, it was unilaterally decided, and codified in Scottish legislation that the on-line access would be limited to 48 hours, however much that limit might be argued, never mind whether any such access limit is valid !!
While there are strong arguments for access to the indexes being free of charge, not least in terms of such access leading, many would argue, to eventual even greater benefit to GROS in terms of the numbers of register and census images that would then be ordered at 5 credits/image, the reality is that GROS has decided to adopt a certain approach in terms of time limited access.
48 hours was seen from the beginning as far too short a period, so that an increase to 7 days, - 168 hours, - can only be seen as positive, - and proof that the User Group's input has produced a result !!
That's not to say that SP users should not continue to advocate other approaches direct to GROS and via the User Group !!...............
Davie
[Later edit....... "any would argue" changed to the intended "......many would argue"

dww]