Post
by SarahND » Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:59 pm
Hi Stewie,
I had a look for your Barton's in 1851. Bear with me if you have already found these-- I tried to figure out from your earlier posts what you had found, but I may have missed something.
First, here is one where maybe the enumerator just put the whole household down as having been born in Ireland? It wouldn't be the first time that the wrong birthplace was marked down.
1851
Parish Number 651
ED: 16A
Page: 7
Household schedule number: 25
Line: 12
2 Bridewell Lane, Airdrie, New Monkland, Lanark
James Bell, 36, head, born in Ireland, labourer
Jane Bell, 32, wife, born in Ireland
James Bell, 8, son, born in Ireland, scholar
James Barton, 30, lodger, born Ireland, labourer
Joseph Stewart, 30, lodger, born in Ireland, ironstone miner
John Watt, 20, lodger, born in Ireland, labourer
William Wilson, 20, lodger, born in Ireland, labourer
Or this suspicious bunch (remember, I am looking at the ancestry index, so try to think like an OCR program):
1851 Parish Number: 651
ED: 31
Page: 38
Household Schedule Number: 129
Line: 6
Burn Sid Cottg, New Monkland, Lanarkshire
Alexr Berton, 40, head, born Airdrie, Lanark, Grocer & Spiret Ida
Bethia Berton, 28, wife, born Airdrie, Lanark
James Berton, 8, son, born Airdrie, Lanark
James Berton, 30, brother, born Lanark, Shap Man
Janet Mason, 25, sister-in-law, born Aldmacple, Lanark
Martha Dunsto, 15, Har Servant, born Christon, Lanark
Could James have got Martha, his brother's servant, pregnant? This is assuming that Dunsto = Dunlop in the "eyes" of the OCR. And that there was a mistake on James death record and the wife's name was given instead of the mother's (wouldn't be the first time for that, either). Then she would indeed have been about 16 when they married...
Well, these are my convoluted ideas to add to those already in the pot (or perhaps use as a cushion when you are banging your head against that brick wall-- looks painful!)
All the best,
Sarah