General Leighton's Regiment

All matters military, militia, regiments and the like. Army, Navy, Air Force etc.

Moderators: Global Moderators, Pandabean

SarahND
Site Admin
Posts: 5647
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
Location: France

Re: Re James Barton

Post by SarahND » Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:33 pm

Jack wrote: By the way, Janet Mason 25 born Aldmacple - that was Ancestry's interpretation of Old Monkland. :roll:
:lol: I knew it had to be something else, but didn't dream of Old Monkland!
Thanks for the clarification on the Restons. It was a bit of a wild guess anyway. We'll see what Stewie thinks about the lodger theory...

Regards,
Sarah

Jack
Posts: 1808
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Paisley

Re: Re James Barton

Post by Jack » Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:37 pm

Hi Sarah,
You need a (very) warped sense of humour to think like Ancestry....
Jack :lol:

SarahND
Site Admin
Posts: 5647
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
Location: France

Re: Re James Barton

Post by SarahND » Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:16 pm

Jack wrote:You need a (very) warped sense of humour to think like Ancestry....
Jack :lol:
Well, there are those who might suggest that that description fits me very well :roll: But I think my sense of humour is warped in a slightly different direction! :lol:
Regards,
Sarah

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Post by StewL » Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:57 am

Hello Sarah and Jack

Sarah
You were asking about whether the names of James mother could have been swapped with his wifes on his DC. His son William was infomant on his DC but he got his wifes name correct, she was Margaret McLuckie, it was on her DC that their son John, gave his parents as her parents :lol:

Jack
The other day when I was having a look at some OPR's and censuses it was in 1851 I got one match but couldnt purchase any credits to have a look, so I assume that was the one you had a peek at. It is just possible that the one you found is him in disguise. :lol:

I dont want to throw another spanner in the works, but I just had a look again at James and Margarets Banns, and his name is written as Burton, perhaps his accent, whatever it was, made Barton sound like Burton :roll:
But that is just a long shot, on the basis that his name is actually Barton. If it isnt then myself and a few others got given that as a middle name in mistake :shock: :lol:

There is a Bethea Barton, James and Margarets grand daughter, parents James Barton and Isabella Williamson, Bethea is Isabellas mothers name.

I have to admit this is a long standing ](*,) I have a fourth cousin who is stuck at the same ](*,) as I am. Sometimes you have to step back just to give the heid a rest from this one, but it is an ongoing puzzler that keeps drawing me back like an addiction. Just wish I could find something about the elusive John Barton and Martha Dunlop.
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson

SarahND
Site Admin
Posts: 5647
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:47 am
Location: France

Post by SarahND » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:49 am

Okay, to bring this thread back to its original question... I just got the pension papers today. Well, it is really only one (big) sheet. It is a partially printed form, with spaces filled in by hand. Not much info, I'm afraid, but it does give his place of residence and his reason for discharge.Here is the text: Printed text is in bold, handwritten in italics.

On the cover:

32 Foot
Robt. Giles
25 June 1791

Robt Giles Discharged from Hull Garrison

N.B. Giles afterward must be sent to London the 25th of this Month in Order that his pention maybe sent to Newberry

Main sheet:

By Lieut Duncan Robertson Commanding one of His Majestys Independent Companys of Invalids Whereof John Fraser Esq is Captain

These do certify that the Bearer Robert Giles Soldier having been ordered by the Commissioners of Chelsea Hospital to the Independent Company of Invalids, commanded by Captain Fraser the 24th Day of November 1768 after being discharged for 21 Years Service in the 32nd Regiment of foot then commanded by Lieut Gen Leighton Hath served honestly and faithfully in the above Company for the Space of 22 years & half; But being now worn out, and rendered unfit for any other Duty on Account of being Insane

He is hereby discharged the said Company, and recommended as a proper Object to partake of his Majesty's Royal Bounty of Chelsea Hospital: Having received all just Demands of Cloathing and Pay from his Entry to the said Company to the 24th Day of June inclusive, as appears by the subjoined Receipt.
And his Residence is in Newberry in Berkshire
Given under my Hand at Hull Citadel this fourteenth Day of June 1791
Robertson Lt. P: G:G:

To the Right Honourable the Lords and Others
Commissioners for the Affairs of Chelsea Hospital


I Hereby acknowledge to have received from my Officers all my Pay, Arrears of Pay, and all Demands from my Entry to the said Company to the 24th Day of June 1791 inclusive.
his
Robt X Giles
mark


Witness John McPherson Serjt.
**************************

Now, the question is, if he was "insane" was his signature acknowledging reception of pay, etc. worth anything at all?

Regards,
Sarah

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Post by StewL » Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:23 am

An interesting read Sarah, sorry for hijacking your original thread. Glad you finally got the pension papers.
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson