MORE HELP DECIPHERING.....

Looking for Scottish Ancestors

Moderator: Global Moderators

Skywave
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland

MORE HELP DECIPHERING.....

Post by Skywave » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:15 pm

Hi Folks,

Just like a Bus two have come along at the same time :lol: Can any one help me by giving thier best guess on all the contents of the upload in the gallery at:

http://talkingscot.com/gallery/displayi ... p?pos=-332[/url]


Thanks

Ron

nelmit
Posts: 4002
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: MORE HELP DECIPHERING

Post by nelmit » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:24 pm

Skywave wrote:Hi Folks,

Just like a Bus two have come along at the same time :lol: Can any one help me by giving thier best guess on all the contents of the upload in the gallery at:

http://talkingscot.com/gallery/displayi ... p?pos=-332[/url]


Thanks

Ron
Best guess - Marion Annie Ogilvie Ingles. 20th May 8h 0m AM, Wellgate, Lanark.

Annette M

Skywave
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland

Post by Skywave » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:28 pm

Annete,

Thank you for the prompt reply

Ron

Lahb
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:30 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Lahb » Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:53 pm

I agree with nelmit - "Marion Annie Ogilvie Ingles" - gotta love the way the registrar flourishes his "m"s!
McFarlane, Harkley, Innes, McLean,Davie,Rainey

AndrewP
Site Admin
Posts: 6189
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Edinburgh

Re: MORE HELP DECIPHERING

Post by AndrewP » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:18 pm

nelmit wrote:Best guess - Marion Annie Ogilvie Ingles. 20th May 8h 0m AM, Wellgate, Lanark.
I agree, plus the "B" in the margin to indicate it was in the "burgh" of the registration district (rather than "L" for Landward).

All the best,

Andrew Paterson

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:21 pm

Lahb wrote:I agree with nelmit - "Marion Annie Ogilvie Ingles" - gotta love the way the registrar flourishes his "m"s!
Such flourishes are one of the biggest problem areas in interpretation, but, thankfully, in this case, the quality of the original microfiche and the scanned image are good, and the registrar's hand isn't otherwise problematic :!: :shock:

David

Skywave
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland

Post by Skywave » Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:39 pm

My thanks to you all. Isnt it funny that you cant see anything till someone else points it out then its as plain as the nose on your face :oops:

A round of applause to you all =D>

Ron

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:03 pm

Skywave wrote:My thanks to you all. Isnt it funny that you cant see anything till someone else points it out then its as plain as the nose on your face :oops:

A round of applause to you all =D>

Ron
Not at all unusual...........

Two factors ..........

Firstly, I and all the other regulars here have many years of experience in interpreting the hands involved, as well as overcoming problems introduced by less than ideal hands, and the associated problems deriving from deterioration in the original records, and associated and derived problems relating to the original microforms, from which the digitised images were later produced.

While not directly relevant in terms of this particular query, a "trick" on the part of experienced researchers is knowing what information and standard wording is likely to appear in the records, never mind how to quickly check out in other records a difficult to read name, .. fore- or sur-

And if you consider that the statutory BMD records from 1855 onwards can occasionally pose a problem, you need to spend 20 years looking at OPRs, testamentary records, sasines, and deeds !! Even after that period of experience, I'm still learning :!: :wink:

David

Skywave
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland

Post by Skywave » Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:47 pm

David,

That why TS is a boon to beginners like me, the experience available on the sight is abundant and freely given.

Can someone explain Landward & Burgh mentioned by Andrew for me.

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:22 pm

Skywave wrote:David,

That why TS is a boon to beginners like me, the experience available on the sight is abundant and freely given.
That's the philosophy of TalkingScot in a nutshell !! =D> :-
Skywave wrote:Can someone explain Landward & Burgh mentioned by Andrew for me.
Many urban registration districts initially at least, distinguished between town and areas outside the town but still included in the registration district, - the latter so-called "Landward", - by the use of the annotations "B" for "Burgh", and "L" for "Landward" to the left of the LH column in the register.

David