Tracing back with OPR records .....

Parish Records and other sources

Moderator: Global Moderators

Rab
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:24 am

Tracing back with OPR records .....

Post by Rab » Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:42 pm

I have personally come to a bit of a stand still tracing my family line back when I entered the OPR era. Due to the lack of information in the entries I've been left scratching my head as to how other people are able to trace back further the the 19th century.

For example a marriage certificate only gives the locations and names of the people being married. Therefore there is no way of confirming the birth of these people as there is no parent entry to cross reference. It's fine if they died after 1855 but if not then I can't see any way to progress.

Is that the case with most people or am I missing something?

Cheers for any tips in advance. :wink:

Ina
Global Moderator
Posts: 1367
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 6:46 am
Location: California,originally from Greenock.

Post by Ina » Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:27 pm

Hi Rab,

That's also been my experience. If they died before 1855 it's very hard to trace them. I'd like to know how some are able to go back to the 1400"s.

Happy searching.

Ina

Rab
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:24 am

Post by Rab » Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:28 pm

My own thought is that it may have something to do with grave searching and/or mort cloths. Hopefully not, I hope there is an easier way that I have just not read about so far.

JimM
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by JimM » Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:43 pm

Hi Rab and Ina

I'm quite sure that OPR's don't go back as far as the 1400's, so that's probably not a realistic target for most people. I find that I am searching mostly around the mid 1700's.

An example I have is a death cert for someone who was 83 when they died in 1863. this means he was born in 1780, a search of the parish records confirms the parents names and shows that they married in 1775 and were born in 1752 and 1756.

There may be times when you have to search "sideways" in order to go back... For a death just prior to 1855 look for any siblings who may have died after 1855.. :lol:
researching
McIntyre, Menzies, Cowley, Pearson, Copland, McCammond, Forbes, Edgar etc. in Scotland
Skinner in Northumberland

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:06 am

Ina wrote:Hi Rab,

That's also been my experience. If they died before 1855 it's very hard to trace them. I'd like to know how some are able to go back to the 1400"s.

Happy searching.

Ina
The most likely way is finding a connection into an aristocratic family for whom a tree already exists, but then how can the accuracy be checked back to the 1400s (OK Balfour Paul's The Scots Peerage can be consulted but, again, how can the information be verified?)

The earliest OPR is 1553, but most don't start until much later. The earliest sasines (property transfers) are 1599, and the earliest Register of Deeds 1554. The latter two can be difficult to exceptionally difficult to search in the earliest records.

Finally the earliest Retours of Services of Heirs are 1544 (inheritance of property), and the very earliest testamentary records (wills) are 1514, with only two other commissariots having extant records prior to the Reformation in 1564.....

Without the help of information from sasines, retours, or testamentary records, never mind deeds, anyone claiming a tree back to the 1400's will be met by a raised eyebrow on my part, and great interest in seeing the information on the sources .........

Without the help of such sources, anything better than probable links via the OPRs back to the late 1600s/early 1700s is unlikely.

David

PS What follows is a pure spoof, but illustrates the manner in which, in the extreme, it could be possible to put together a tree that goes back even earlier than the 1400S !!! It was originally posted on soc.gen.britain some years ago. While it is exaggeration it is at the same time a reflection of the way some people appear to be quite happy to search, but, I'm sure, not including anyone on TS !



FIND ALL YOUR ANCESTORS ONLINE!

© Roy Stockdill July 2005


WELCOME to my super-fast instant ancestry programme! I am proud to announce the launch of an exciting new service for wannabe family historians who find research the old-fashioned way rather boring. You, too, can have a family tree back to Adam and Eve ENTIRELY from the Internet!!! Here is an amazing, once-in-a-lifetime, never-to-be repeated offer.....

SEND me $10,000, your date of birth, your chest and inside leg measurements, the location of the pub where your granny met your grandad and the name of that milkman with the hairy nose that your Auntie Maude had the wild affair with - and I guarantee I will have your family tree at least back to Nebuchadnezzar the Daft of Outer Mongolia in the 3rd century BC before you can say "IGI" !!!

NO more listening to boring old farts droning on how about how you need to read a book on family history. Books - outdated, who needs 'em?

NO more need to visit dreary old Record Offices or waste your precious time looking at boring bits of paper covered in squiggly writing that you can't understand anyway.

NO more need to listen to self-appointed, so-called experts who try to tell you they can help you just because they've been in genealogy since March 1897 and who will try and persuade you to join a family history society where you will meet hordes of equally boring people who also think they know it all.

Guaranteed Results !!!

I absolutely guarantee you a family tree you can be proud of, one that will show your descent from such famous historical figures as Mary Queen of Scots, Oliver Cromwell, Sir Francis Drake, William the Conqueror, Charlemagne, the Norse god Woden, Charles II's head coachman's illegitimate son, a 4th cousin twice removed of Henry VIII, Cyril the Incontinent of Babylon, Frederick the Flatulent of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Baron Frankenstein, Joan Collins and the Man in the Off-Licence Round the Corner.

How do I do it? Simple - I log onto the Internet, spend half an hour or so trawling the world wide web and - bingo! - there is your Instant Family Tree! Here's how it works...

First, I find the marriage of your great-granny on the IGI, then I find someone of the same name who was born in a parish 100 miles away from where she was married, so that's bound to be her, isn't it? Then I e-mail this mate of mine who specialises in doing look-ups from the 1861 census [which hasn't been indexed] in places like London, Leeds, Sheffield, Bristol, Manchester and Glasgow.

He sticks a pin in anywhere on the census and gives me a couple more names to work with. I reckon they have as much chance as being your gt-gt-grandparents as anyone else, so it's back to the Net. I feed the names into umpteen databases and websites until I come up with someone of the same name who claims to be descended from Edward III. Ah, yes, this looks as good a bet as any. Nobody is going to notice if I casually slip your gt-gt-grandad and granny into a GEDCOM that shows they were also descended from Alfred the Great and the monk who did the slopping-out at Whitby Abbey, are they?

So there you have it - a wonderful, Instant Family Tree, and all from the Internet. And what I don't find I simply MAKE UP!!! What could be easier? Apply now for the bargain of all time and discover how to make Internet genealogy really work for you!


Roy Stockdill, Editor, The Journal of One-Name Studies
The Stockdill Family History Society

Web page:- http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/roystock
Web page of the Guild of One-Name Studies:- http://www.one-name.org

”Never ask a man if he comes from Yorkshire. If he does he will tell you. If he does not, why humiliate him?" - Canon Sydney Smith (scholar and humorist 1771-1845)

scooter
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Kent, England

Post by scooter » Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:48 am

Genius!

Judging by some of the family homepages I've seen on the web in recent times, this seems to be a perfectly acceptable way of tracing your roots back to obscure sixth century Danish princes - and the like.

That certainly brightened up, what is already a very golden morning in the Garden of England.

Cheers David.
Researching Wishart (Glasgow & Kirkcaldy), McDonald (Donegal & Falkirk), Thomson (Star, Fife) & Harley (Monimail, Moonzie & Cupar)

Rab
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:24 am

Post by Rab » Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:34 pm

:lol: Class post David, a very enjoyable read. :D

StewL
Posts: 1396
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:59 am
Location: Perth Western Australia

Post by StewL » Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:42 am

Brilliant Davie

But I have a problem with your post. Especially the disparaging way you mentioned Frederick the Flatulent of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
I have it on very good authority, and from my family, that I am directly descended from this gentleman :D :lol: :wink:

The proof lies in the very term Frederick the Flatulent :lol: :lol: :wink:

Nice post though, I think at this time I am nearing my 1700's limit on my lot of long lost and departed ancestors.
Stewie

Searching for: Anderson, Balks, Barton, Courtney, Davidson, Downie, Dunlop, Edward, Flucker, Galloway, Graham, Guthrie, Higgins, Laurie, Mathieson, McLean, McLuckie, Miln, Nielson, Payne, Phillips, Porterfield, Stewart, Watson

sheilajim
Posts: 787
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: san clemente california

Post by sheilajim » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:07 pm

Great Post

Last June, when I told my sister that I was getting interested in geneology, she told me with a perfectly straight face that her Mother-in-Law had traced her family back to 13th century Norway.( Her Mother-in Law's family were Norwegian). :o

I don't know anything about Norways records, but told my sister that records for the average person, don't usually go back that far. "Oh", she said. " They get the information out of old Bibles". :roll:

I think that the earliest Bibles were printed in the late 15th century. Even then, they must have been bought only by the wealthy and literate. I doubt that many people had a bible to write in till the late 18th century, if then.

:wink: :lol:

Sheila
Sheila

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:30 pm

sheilajim wrote:...snipped............I don't know anything about Norways records, but told my sister that records for the average person, don't usually go back that far. "Oh", she said. " They get the information out of old Bibles". :roll:

I think that the earliest Bibles were printed in the late 15th century. Even then, they must have been bought only by the wealthy and literate. I doubt that many people had a bible to write in till the late 18th century, if then.....snipped............. Sheila
Hi Sheila

Other countries, other systems, but based on "Angus Baxter's "In Search of Your European Roots" I'd comment as follows.

The earliest Norwegian Kirkebøker, the equivalent of the Scottish OPRs go back to the early 1600s, but, as in Scotland, some only started much later.

That written, it wouldn't surprise me if there were family bible records going back even earlier, and while your comments on the date of the earliest printed bibles are quite correct, it wouldn't at all surprise me if it was the case that, whenever a family did obtain a bible, they recorded in it not only the current generations, but also a number of earlier generations.

In addition to the Kirkebøker there are also Bygdebøker which give very detailed information on farms and families in Norwegian parishes. You would need to contact StatsArchiv in Oslo and maybe the 6 regional Statsarchiv in Hamar, Kristiansund, Stavanger, Bergen, Trondheim and Tromsø to check the situation for "your" parishes.

In the first instance I'd suggest that you contact riksarkivet@riksarkivaren.dep.no

David