Gene Detectives

Useful places to look up facts

Moderator: Global Moderators

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:31 pm

Chris Paton wrote:I believe it is a well known fact as well that if you are of a white skin colour, you are believed to be of European origin, but if you have a very very very super duper white whiter-than-white skin, it can be attributed to the fact that you come from County Antrim. As someone who gets snowblindness just from looking at the underside of my arms, and who is therefore forced to wear long sleeved shirts even to bed, I can personally testify to the accuracy of this theory, and was wondering whether a colour or tonal chart chart would therefore be another useful tool for your exciting new research service?

:)

Chris
"Well known fact" it might be, but it's wrong, - see last week's New Scientist - http://www.newscientist.com/channel/bei ... -code.html .

But being a "weel kent fact" obviously does indeed qualify the characteristic for inclusion in Gene Detective Family Tracing Ltd's ©® info requirements list.

David

PS You must also have Scandinavians in your ancestry, as they are even more sensitive.
dww


Gene Detective Family Tracing Ltd ©®

Please send us the following information.

1. Photographs, both full face and profile
2. A tape of your voice.
3. Details of your physical quirks, e.g. ability to rub head and stomach in different directions simultaneously, touch the tip of your nose with your tongue, etc., etc.,
4. Lung capacity, height, blood pressure, eye sight.
5. "Deep ancestry" DNA test results.
6. Skin colour (see attached chart)

Place your order now and get a 10% discount. Due to overwhelming demand the prices of our services are being increased by 50% on 1st April 2007.

Falkyrn
Posts: 309
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by Falkyrn » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:38 pm

Just got back to this thread (the curse of working full time again :wink: )
and noted the BBC reply to Chris
A Councillor was on hand to support the contributors
was this a County Councillor or City Councillor ?

I understand that we are now asking our local politicians to take on different roles but surely even this is going a little too far.
~RJ Paton~

bryanbid
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:57 pm
Location: Lancashire, England

Post by bryanbid » Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:33 pm

Hi all

to DavidWW
I noticed with interest your post (Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:19 pm)outlining the services offered by Gene Detective has been edited 4 times the final edit being (Last edited by DavidWW on Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:03 pm; edited 4 times in total) sadly I missed the 1st 3 postings. I have read all the posts that are available to be viewed by us the members.

To all
I have not seen the programme being discussed, but should I have the opportunity to see it I will. This is my choice.

As for the SOG endorsing the programme I didnt think so (but thats only my opinion), what they did was to provide the Location for the programme and to outline the programmes objective and method, (thats what I read having followed DavidWW`s link to the SOG)

Please remember we have choice, and we are all individuals. What might be a distasteful programme to you, may be a thoroughly entertaining programme to someone else. Obviously 3000 individuals thought it was entertaining and useful, as they have contacted Gene Detective for help.

Regards

Bryan

DavidWW
Posts: 5057
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:47 pm

Post by DavidWW » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:19 pm

bryanbid wrote:Hi all

to DavidWW
I noticed with interest your post (Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:19 pm)outlining the services offered by Gene Detective has been edited 4 times the final edit being (Last edited by DavidWW on Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:03 pm; edited 4 times in total) sadly I missed the 1st 3 postings. I have read all the posts that are available to be viewed by us the members.
All the edits were minor grammatical and spelling matters, or very obviously related to suggested additions from other posters to the service in later posts in the thread, otherwise I'd had specified the subject of the edits.
bryanbid wrote:To all
I have not seen the programme being discussed, but should I have the opportunity to see it I will. This is my choice.

As for the SOG endorsing the programme I didnt think so (but thats only my opinion), what they did was to provide the Location for the programme and to outline the programmes objective and method, (thats what I read having followed DavidWW`s link to the SOG)

Please remember we have choice, and we are all individuals. What might be a distasteful programme to you, may be a thoroughly entertaining programme to someone else. Obviously 3000 individuals thought it was entertaining and useful, as they have contacted Gene Detective for help.

Regards

Bryan
I dont believe that any of my posts or those of Chris Paton and others suggested that others might not find the programme "entertaining" !, - that's very much a matter of personal choice.

I don't recall describing the programme as distasteful, just completely and utterly inaccurate in terms of suggesting that various so-called "experimental research techniques" were valid genealogical research techniques, - see my spoof "Gene Detective Family Tracing Ltd ©®" posts.

David

bryanbid
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:57 pm
Location: Lancashire, England

Post by bryanbid » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:27 pm

DavidWW

You appear to be under the impression I directed all of my post to you and you alone I did not. I did direct the 1st part of my post to you, which you kindly answered in your reply.

Bryan

Chris Paton
Posts: 433
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:14 pm

Post by Chris Paton » Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:46 pm

Hi Bryan,

My understanding is that the series has been recommissioned, so hopefully you'll be able to exercise your right to see it when it returns! :)

Regards,

Chris
Tha an lasair nad anam aig meadhan do bhith
Nas làidir 's nas motha na riaghaltas no rìgh.